May 29, 2009

安华黑眼圈事件另有内情?

Former KL CID Chief declared a bankrupt

1. I am the person named in your reports which appeared practically in all the mainstream media or otherwise today .Please allow me to respond to your publications.

2. Friends and relatives have called me wondering how on earth a matter which is a non-issue and most of all not worthy of publication have been given prominence at par with National issue.I was never the IGP,nor a Director or a CPO before.I was just a common retired Senior Assistant Commissioner II who went on optional retirement some 8 years ago.I am not a member of any political party and have no intention of being one.Surely you too are curious to know the reasons why the above news on me had to be played up as such.No ordinary person can influence the entire media to run this sort of news simultenously and over radio and TV.(I shall touch on the subject matter later).



3. I say with certainty that there are very powerful hidden hands that wanted it so.Their reasons are to destroy my credibility and/or to paralyze my capabilities and preventing me from giving evidence against Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail(Gani)and IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan(Musa) for fabricating evidence in the “Black-Eye” case of 1998 involving Dato ‘Seri Anwar Ibrahim (Anwar).


Brief Facts:Allegation by Anwar.

4. I was the Investigation Officer of the infamous Black-eye incident in 1998 which I assure you was done professionally and without fear or favour.


5. On 1.7.2008 Anwar lodged a police report alleging four persons namely Gani,Musa,one Dr.Abdul Rahman Yusof (Dr.Rahman) and myself have falsified a medical report on him(Anwar) in the black-eye case.This allegation was investigated by the MACC(then ACA).


6. My detail statements was recorded no less than five times by the Investigation Officer.I made full disclosure and provided the MACC with documentary evidence which I believe,was more than sufficient to proof criminal wrongdoings on the part of Gani in particular.


7. On 1.3.2009,Dato Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan(Ahmad Said),the Chief Commissioner of MACC announced in The Star that a 3 member independent panel appointed by the Solicitor General to scrutinize the investigation paper have found Gani and Musa cleared of any criminal wrongdoings


8. Again on 11.3.2009 YB Dato Seri Mohd.Nazri Abdul Aziz(YB Nazri)Minister in PM’s Department in answer to a question posed in Parliament repeated that Gani and Musa are both cleared of any wrongdoings except with regard to Gani, where one of the panel members dissented,but still leaving Dr.Rahman’s and my position in jeopardy..


9. In view of this, on the 15.4.2009 I submitted my appeal to the Chairman of the Advisory Board of MACC and extended copies of same to all the Committee Members as well as to the Chairman of the other Panels, including all members of the Select Committee to review the above findings.I provided the members with detail arguments and attached supporting documentary evidences that I believe would be sufficient to proof that Gani and Musa were involved and/or abetted in the falsification of the medical reports on Anwar in the black-eye case,and that they should not have been cleared..I have yet to receive any response from the Board but believe it is still under their considerations.


10. Yet again on the 7.5.2009 I followed-up my appeal and extended copies to the Solicitor General as well as to the Solicitor General II.Once again I provided them with arguments and submissions which I believe could show that Gani not only falsified 1(one)medical report as alleged by Anwar,but instead THREE , with Musa believed to be involved in at least two of them. I hope this too is being looked into seriously.


11. However,I am justified to state that YAB Prime Minister,was never told the true and entire facts of this issue.Should the truth be told,I believe YAB PM would have taken the appropriate actions.


12. Looking at the contents of your publications,the bankruptcy notice was issued on the 21.4.2009 whilst the order was issued on 14.5.2009.Why was it only publicized on the 27.5.2009?.I have reason to believe that the notice was obtained about 1 week after I have filed my appeal to the MACC Board on 15.4.2009 while they were only published on 27.5.2009 after Anwar vowed that he will provide a tough defence in the sodomy charge against him fixed to be heard beginning 1.7.2009 when he addressed an International Correspondence seminar in Singapore a couple of days ago.


13. I have reasons to believe that the Prosecution team anticipated that Anwar will certainly raise at certain point of his trial the issue of fabrication of evidence in the black-eye case.My evidence would be vital at this stageTheir only option is to destroy my credibility.


13. Though this publication may cause some inconvenience to me and my family,but I take it as a blessing and that it will only enhance my resolve to disclose the whole truth of the “black-eye” episode.Believe me,that this is not the only case the duo had their fingers in.There are others which are as sensational.The truth shall prevail.


14. With regard to the bankruptcy matter,I have instructed my lawyer to look into the matter which came as a surprise to me especially when I was never served personally of any notice of the hearing I hope this explain my position.


15. I am in no position to demand my response to be published in its entirety,but certainly there are issues which are of common concern.


Regards,
MAT ZAIN BIN IBRAHIM28.5.2009

7 comments:

  1. BRAVO KEYKOK!

    http://www.merdekareview.com/news/n/9784.html

    林良实陈广才曾发支持信
    作者/本刊陈慧思 May 29, 2009 12:30:14 pm

    【本刊陈慧思撰述】两名前交通部长林良实及陈广才曾以交通部长的名义,分别向马来西亚国际商业银行家(Malaysian International Merchant Bankers Berhad)、太平洋信托人有限公司(Pacific Trustees Berhad)及马来西亚评估有限公司(Malaysia Rating Corporation Berhad)发出“支持信”,指称交通部将确保巴生港务局承担财务责任,摊还欠Kuala Dimensi私人有限公司的购地余款和利息。

    林良实曾任马华公会总会长,而陈广才则曾任马华公会署理总会长。

    林良实(左图)的公函志期2003年5月28日,陈广才发出的三封公函则分别志期2004年4月23日、2005年12月8日和2006年5月23日。在法律上,财政部是唯一有权代表政府签署保证信的政府部门,但财政部签发的保证书还需得到内阁批准。不过,交通部发出的四封公函都没有财政部和内阁的签名。

    《独立新闻在线》今天前往巴生港务局阅读昨天公布的巴生港口自贸区(Port Klang Free Zone)的稽查报告。林良实和陈广才担任交通部长期间签发的四封保证信也列在附录中。这份稽查报告公开让公众翻阅两周,不过不能影印或拍摄报告内容。

    昨天,巴生港务局主席李华民公开了普华永道稽查公司(PriceWaterHouseCoopers)撰写的巴生自贸区稽查报告,该报告也证实了之前已揭露的土地转售弊端、行政弊端及管理弊端。李华民也于今早前往布城马来西亚反贪委员会投报,要该委员会调查此事。

    安华曾揭公函事件

    民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥、八打灵再也北区国会议员潘俭伟、秘书长林冠英的经济顾问郑其昌、巴生市议员王小萍、八打灵再也市议员孙贵财、林吉祥的助理林芮光、吴庆忠和各媒体记者自早上八时开始,就到巴生港务局会议室阅读和研究附录内容。林吉祥将在中午12时在港务局召开记者会。

    人民公正党实权领袖安华依布拉欣(Anwar Ibrahim)曾于2007年12月19日揭露前交通部长林良实和当时的部长陈广才(右图)曾在2003年5月至2006年5月之间,签发了四封保证信给Kuala Dimensi私人有限公司旗下的四家子公司——Special Port Vehicle、Transshipment Megahub、Valid Ventures及Free Zone Capital,宣称政府是巴生港口自贸区计划的财务担保人。

    林良实的公函志期2003年5月28日,陈广才发出的三封公函则分别志期2004年4月23日、2005年12月8日和2006年5月23日。

    安华当时也出示马来西亚评估公司的报告佐证说法。分析行发布在网上的报告中给这四家有限公司非常高的评价,原因是巴生港务局得到政府的强力支持,且有一封发自交通部的“支持信”撑腰。【点击:安华揭发巴生自贸区新内情 林良实陈广才越权发保证信】

    ReplyDelete
  2. 你们先预测一下Mat Zain的后果吧!

    ReplyDelete
  3. 好复杂,背后还有很多不为人知的事情。

    谁邪谁正谁知道?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Satu Projek Hebat Kerajaan Barisan Nasional

    Rakyat Malaysia patut rasa berterima kasih dan bersyukur kepada Kerajaan Barisan Nasional yang telah banyak membawa kepada pembangunan negara.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 老兄,

    你那位匿名的朋友是不会看主题还是害怕你没有看到那篇报导?

    有些人真的很奇怪!

    ReplyDelete
  6. 看完了,谢谢啊key。

    看来,要做正义的事,又一个人被当屈原了。

    ReplyDelete
  7. 我不打算写港口事情,感觉上很累.......

    ReplyDelete