tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post7868266128280638862..comments2023-10-29T23:38:58.466+08:00Comments on 曾聒: 回教党不了解回教Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-7839850990091232162009-06-21T14:37:01.676+08:002009-06-21T14:37:01.676+08:00Thanks for sharing.Thanks for sharing.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-82600865892581261752009-06-21T01:29:40.632+08:002009-06-21T01:29:40.632+08:00I was in the assembly hall when Mohd Nizar debated...I was in the assembly hall when Mohd Nizar debated the issue.<br /><br />Nizar's message was that teaching Science and mathematics in English can cause great trouble to religious schools which are mostly founded and operated by PAS members in rural area.<br /><br />UMNO hostiles these religious schools because they are the fountain of strength for PAS. They produce PAS'S Islamic radicals. These religious schools also teach science and mathematics subjects so that the students can pass the government exams and get theirs certificates for further studies locally or abroad. <br /><br />You can imagine the level of English command of these rural religious schools students. Can they understand and pass the exams if science and mathematics subjects are taught in English? For sure they will be disqualified!<br />Then, Nizar said in the assembly, parents will not send their children to religious schools considering their future. This is the subtle way Dr. Mahathir and UMNO tried to eradicate PAS-based religious schools, Nizar explained.<br /><br />Nizar's argument is logical. Nizar's knowledge and understanding of Islam is based on his reading of English books and learning from his teachers and friends in an English environment in England, same as Khalid Samad, MP of Shah Alam and Dr. Zulkifli Ahmad, MP of Kuala Selangor, during their youth days. I am sure Nizar will agree with me that being able to read English books will broaden a muslim's world view and make him a better muslim. But Nizar just cannot agree with the policy to impose teaching of science and mathematics subjects in English to rural religious school students for the outcome will bad.UMMATAUNWASOTOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09990839490996740996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-44707216457688323862009-06-12T17:12:37.009+08:002009-06-12T17:12:37.009+08:00haha!
我查到的,只有阿拉伯文,没有阿拉姆语,可能记载中统称“阿拉伯文”,他们省下了解释。
...haha!<br /><br />我查到的,只有阿拉伯文,没有阿拉姆语,可能记载中统称“阿拉伯文”,他们省下了解释。<br /><br />我所知道的像您所说,开始是记录在石头和木。<br /><br />谢谢您的分享。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-53828493237622251862009-06-12T16:46:43.818+08:002009-06-12T16:46:43.818+08:00振国,
小生只是以做学问的角度跟你分享,可兰经的原版不是绝对的是阿拉伯文。因为在先知死后才出现记载在...振国,<br />小生只是以做学问的角度跟你分享,可兰经的原版不是绝对的是阿拉伯文。因为在先知死后才出现记载在书的可兰经。"原版"是记录在石片,树叶(枣叶),兽皮上。<br /><br />那时候是阿拉伯文草创的时候,还未在中东普及化。有学者说真正记录在"原版"是用亚拉姆语。而阿拉伯文又是亚拉姆语系演变而来的。<br /><br />亚拉姆语有三千年历史,亚伯拉罕诸教多用它来记录经文。回教跟亚伯拉罕诸的渊源,难道"原版"可兰经就没有可能用亚拉姆语记录吗?<br /><br />支持的派系就说,可兰经里的"阿拉伯文",就算是精通阿拉伯文母语的阿拉伯人,也很难弄得懂。<br /><br />真正的落到各穆斯林手里的"原版"被奥斯曼集合然后销毁,奥斯曼就"统一"了我们现在的可兰经。过程中有没有被篡改和错误翻译我们就不得而知。<br /><br />所以说这世界上是没有一个人真正了解回教。Fair仔https://www.blogger.com/profile/02959390844959277429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-84914615228987303822009-06-12T14:38:05.211+08:002009-06-12T14:38:05.211+08:00sunday i will go there.....sunday i will go there.....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-36673331069023588422009-06-12T11:31:56.303+08:002009-06-12T11:31:56.303+08:00keykok said...
but u r always welcome....haha!
I...keykok said... <br />but u r always welcome....haha!<br /><br />I like to see how MxA talk out of logic nonsenses without references, and the same times play two face games, one side ChuaCD, one side OTK. In other worlds, i like to watch show, and learn talk nonsense from MxA.<br /><br />So You sure i am still welcome?<br /><br />Keykok, i also like to see you write about Bukit Koman, why not try write one? or this topic is "un-write-able" after your MxA MoH insists it is 100% safe (talk by mouth, as usual).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-66546969777693785232009-06-12T10:55:17.253+08:002009-06-12T10:55:17.253+08:00but u r always welcome....haha!but u r always welcome....haha!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-62218036003835017852009-06-12T10:51:55.469+08:002009-06-12T10:51:55.469+08:00keykok said...i think u enter wrong blog.
Can'...keykok said...i think u enter wrong blog.<br /><br />Can't show/share the references or your argument, and suggest i should go away?<br /><br />ok lar, thanks for your clarification anyway.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-67220991122462269022009-06-12T10:48:11.529+08:002009-06-12T10:48:11.529+08:00i think u enter wrong blog.i think u enter wrong blog.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-42038854920069851022009-06-12T10:45:10.343+08:002009-06-12T10:45:10.343+08:00Keykok said: 根据查询原版的《可兰经》是阿拉伯文
You mind to share ...Keykok said: 根据查询原版的《可兰经》是阿拉伯文<br /><br />You mind to share the source fo your research? I mean, actual source that well accept in academic, not another article published in another cincai blog.<br /><br />Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-81735629653766343822009-06-12T10:42:25.593+08:002009-06-12T10:42:25.593+08:00Heheh, yaya, talk nonsense and answer nonsense.
M...Heheh, yaya, talk nonsense and answer nonsense.<br /><br />My point is, language (bahasa) and religion are both highly complex issue, so if you think a speech of Nizar for 1 hour (guess lar) is wrong, then how sure your own short article is better than him? <br /><br />Of course, my comment is even shorter that your great short article, hence i could be wrong too. As you said, i am talking nonsense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-22411026272833327192009-06-12T10:02:20.645+08:002009-06-12T10:02:20.645+08:00根据查询原版的《可兰经》是阿拉伯文,反正不可能是马来文.
ANONYMOUS,
u always ...根据查询原版的《可兰经》是阿拉伯文,反正不可能是马来文.<br /><br />ANONYMOUS,<br />u always talk nonsense, if u not understand what i mean, please read again. <br /><br />Bahasa Malaysia is not a reason to reunion religion.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06320613687760226521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-7745622323238777212009-06-12T09:17:53.269+08:002009-06-12T09:17:53.269+08:00Keykok, you sounded like you know very well of thi...Keykok, you sounded like you know very well of this?<br /><br />Do you have a degree in islamic study? Or Lingustic and Religion Study? Where and When you obtained your degree? Any Publication in Major<br /><br />If you do not have these, mind to show your references of your article? From which scholor? Which Book? Which Journal?<br /><br />If do not have also, meaning you are even worst thatn Nizar as you condemn. TALK ONLY lar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7560443057943367339.post-90702096375731667732009-06-12T07:49:03.379+08:002009-06-12T07:49:03.379+08:00可能他的意思是用英文会"西化"和"世俗化"马来人。但同样有争议。
可兰经的真正原版可能不是阿拉伯文...可能他的意思是用英文会"西化"和"世俗化"马来人。但同样有争议。<br /><br />可兰经的真正原版可能不是阿拉伯文。阿拉伯文的可兰经只是在那时候发扬光大。 所以几乎每个人都认定可兰经是阿拉伯文为原版。Fair仔https://www.blogger.com/profile/02959390844959277429noreply@blogger.com